Search This Blog

Friday, 30 October 2015

Net neutraility in the US and the EU

Europe has just proposed its own version of net neutrality law and critics are already tearing it apart. This article from The Economist compares it to the US version and broadly concludes that the European law is looser on net neutrality than the US, which will result in less innovation on the Internet. The article claims that the main reason for this difference between the two continents comes from the fact that in Europe, the balance of lobbying power is in favour of the large infrastructure (telco) companies instead of Internet platforms. In fact, European telcos - many of which are close to the government it is claimed - find eager listeners in regulatory bodies who are tired to witness the crushing success of American Internet giants on their continent. 

This view is quite superficial. First of all, I don't think that there is such a large difference across the two continents in their approaches to net neutrality: there are loopholes large enough in both laws as well as many uncertainties concerning details of implementation - The Economist ends their analysis acknowledging that the US law faces many hurdles still. Second, it is not clear that European telcos have more leverage with their governments than say AT&T (which has just managed to reassemble itself to control a large chunk of digital traffic), or say, Comcast and some other large cable networks. Third, expensive infrastructure for consumers is just as much a roadblock to innovation on the Internet than net neutrality - in fact, arguably more so. European broadband costs are much lower than equivalent service costs in the US and as a result Internet usage is way ahead in Europe compared to the US. Fourth, net neutrality is not an unambiguous good thing so that more of it is automatically better. Network management is complex and priority needs to be provided to some content to avoid congestion - finding the right balance is extremely complex. While some bandwidth needs to be guaranteed to poor new application providers, it makes sense for intense users to pay more for the infrastructure used. 

Innovation on the Internet has been dismal in Europe when compared to the US. This however, does not come from overregulation of the Internet but much more from the lack of appropriate financial infrastructure and the lack an investment friendly economic environment. Indeed, the gap in innovation across the two continents is also present in other industries, not just technology.

5 comments:

  1. Things being what they are, what is the enchantment of those recreations?
    clashroyalehack.site

    ReplyDelete
  2. The design isn't smooth, the amusement play is exceptionally shortsighted and the greater part of those diversions are extremely dreary, why do clients love arcade recreations to such an extent? scary maze game 5

    ReplyDelete
  3. Indeed, similar to each great story, there are numerous reasons.bus simulator download

    ReplyDelete
  4. Google and Open Handset Alliance's open source versatile application is getting prominent the same number of various applications can be created through Android application. http://www.moviehdapp.org

    ReplyDelete
  5. However buying premade content can always land students in trouble for they are written according to the topic and are not customized to meet the formatting requirements of the assignment. http://researchpapersforsale.org

    ReplyDelete